We do not necessarily have a duty to do what is morally good. A morally good action may require an individual to make a sacrifice on his part - for example, give some of his income to charity. It is morally good precisely because it is not a duty - an individual goes beyond his duty. If it were his duty, then the action would not be morally good. It would simply be a requirement of him.
To understand this, we can use a simple example - should I give £10 to a homeless man on the street? If I were not to give it, my inaction would not be morally bad. It is morally neutral. For the action to be morally bad, I would have to cause the homeless individual a direct, first-order harm. If, on the other hand, I stole £10 from the man, then it would be morally bad since I have caused direct harm.
To understand this, we can use a simple example - should I give £10 to a homeless man on the street? If I were not to give it, my inaction would not be morally bad. It is morally neutral. For the action to be morally bad, I would have to cause the homeless individual a direct, first-order harm. If, on the other hand, I stole £10 from the man, then it would be morally bad since I have caused direct harm.
No comments:
Post a Comment